|
Chair: |
Mary Cooper |
Vice Chair: |
Bill Warning |
| Secretary: |
Marie Elliott |
Treasurer: |
Diane Plucinak |
Director: |
Bill Maylone |
Past Chair:
|
Ev McKay |
|
 |
 |
MAYNE ISLAND INTEGRATED
WATER SYSTEMS SOCIETY
Mayne Island Integrated Water
Systems Society
4rd Annual Southern Gulf Islands Water Workshop
The Year of the Aquifer
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Attendance: 140
 |
 |
Lions Club accepting UV water
purification system from Hallet UV,
WaterTiger and MB Labs, and
MIIWSS donating members. |
Full house |
 |
 |
Well driller, Red Williams
|
E.D.S. Pumps display
and consulting |
 |
 |
Dr Alfonso Rivera,
Chief Hydrologist for
Natural Resources Canada |
Exhibitors Row |
 |
 |
Minute taking for the
workshop report |
Dr Quentin Cronk talks on Xeriscaping |
 |
 |
Presentation by MIIWSS,
Mary to Diana |
Presentation of Allen book to Saturna
library |
Click on photos to enlarge
Notes on Presentations
Speaker |
Discussion |
| Opening Remarks
Ev McKay,
MIIWSS Chair |
Introduction of the event
Appreciation to participants, supporters and attendees |
| Introductory Remarks
Mary Cooper, Vice Chair and
Program Director,
MIIWSS |
Excerpts from Mary Cooper’s
morning presentation:
Welcome to the 4th Annual Southern Gulf Island
Water Workshop: Year of the Aquifer.
A special welcome to our guest speakers from the
San Juan Islands, Vicki Heater and Tim Pope, who
make this our first international event.
Each of our speakers and exhibitors have given up
their weekend, some traveling a considerable distance,
to be with us.
Their time and knowledge constitutes a 100% donation
to this workshop and we sincerely appreciate their
generosity.
The workshop report will be e-mailed to each of
you, and posted on our website: www.mayneisland.com/water.
Workshop details:
For the first year, we are a bottled water free
zone
Dereck Atha, Gulfport Realty, has provided notepads
We have gone into the rain gauge business and for
only $2 (less than our cost) you can take several
home for family and friends
We have copies of Beyond Pipes and Pumps available
- $2. Again, below at our cost.
We also have water conservation signs available
at our cost of $5.
We have 9 islands represented here today from the
Trust area, Saturna, Galiano, Gabriola, Salt Spring,
North and South Penders, Hornby, Mayne and a sister
island, Quadra, as well as folks from Victoria,
Mill Bay, Nanaimo and Vancouver.
We are also welcoming 6 sister advocacy and stewardship
groups, 16 water purveyors and many individual well
owners.
You will also come across folks from the Islands
Trust, Ministry of Environment, BC Groundwater Assoc
and several businesses.
Off hand, I would say this is about the best example
of cross representation one could find for such
an important topic.
Obviously, we need financial backing to put on
workshops of practical value with low fees, and
remain viable for long term programming.
We have so many to thank for helping us to meet
those goals: every year our CRD Director Susan DeGryp
is the first to offer support, the Ministry of Environment
with wonderful encouragement from our friends in
Nanaimo, and all 5 of the southern Southern Gulf
Island Trust committees. This year several of our
members stepped forward with donations, some in
cash and some in kind. A huge thank you to all.
Our membership reaches well beyond the Gulf islands
now, to include Vancouver Island up to Nanaimo and
the mainland. For the first time, we have community
water system memberships on 5 SGI. Our wish would
be that this will be a uniting factor, promoting
the uniqueness of our island aquifers at all levels
of government, and including all individuals who
choose to participate in our island lifestyles.
There are 2 young ladies here on University projects.
Shelagh Thompson is a Masters Candidate, School
of Resource & Environment at Simon Fraser University,
and has chosen to place Mayne Island under the microscope.
Shelagh’s project is part of a larger research
program currently underway at S F U Centre for Tourism
Policy and Research, involving four case studies
where lifestyle migration is a factor: Ucluelet,
Naramata, Fernie, and Mayne Island.
They are assessing the extent to which ‘lifestyle
migrants’ are changing the character of destination
communities ,and how these communities are responding
to the pressure.
The perceptions and behavior of both permanent and
second-home/seasonal lifestyle residents concerning
existing, emerging, and reactions to a range of
alternative water resource management, will form
the results.
The goal is to determine which water resource management
issues are critical to address, and the preferred
ways of dealing with them. Hopefully our approaches
will be helpful to other marine based island destinations
. In depth interviews with water people will initiate
the project, followed by a household questionnaire.
Shelagh would love to have guidance from as many
people as possible.
Next to Shelagh is Susanne Porter-Bopp, Community
Water Coordinator with the UVIC Polis Project on
Ecological Governance.
Susanne has info on the expansion of this Project
to the islands, and on the Polis Project in general.
Oliver Brandes will go into more detail in his presentation
later this morning.
I’d like to take a minute to talk about an
asset to our communities that we rarely think about:
our small water systems operators. Most of us know
what they do, but very little about the qualifications
required to do their job, and this all ties in with
a problem within our system and our Integrated programming.
There’s government involvement here, so naturally
its rather convoluted.
There are 17 small water systems operators here
today earning .5 Continuing Education Units.
SWS operators must have over 50 hours related experience,
followed by a 2 day course and exams before being
certified and registered with the Environmental
Operators Certification Program,(EOCP), which is
administered under contract to the Ministry of Health
(MoH). After certification, the operators must earn
1.8 CEUs within a 2 year time span as part of continuing
certification maintenance, plus pay a $50 annual
fee.
These courses become very expensive for very small
water systems of 12 or 20 connections, when it involves
travel, accommodation and costs of over $200 for
a 1 day course--- and some are 3 and 5 day courses.
You pay for this out of your water taxes if you
are on an organized system.
Part of our roll as Integrated Water is to balance
programming to help our operators get those CEUs
as economically as possible, while still providing
programming of educational interest and assistance
for our single well owners,
and while lobbying governments of behalf of our
community aquifers . In return, we hope that the
operators and their boards will assist us by passing
their expertise along to fellow islanders
with single wells.
Here a problem arises: thanks to Ministry of Health,
we are gradually losing operators.
MoH has taken the position that if there are over
500 warm bodies drawing on your small community
system on any given day, you must have a certified
SWS operator. But, under 500, they will settle for
someone who has taken a lesser ‘water safe’
course.
I live in an area with maximum 300, and I am not
even remotely happy about being thought of as a
second class water consumer, and that the safe purveyance
of my drinking water is of lesser concern. The entire
population of Saturna Island would not make up a
system requiring a certified operator, nor does
any Mayne or Galiano system require a certified
operator.
The under 500 breakdown is not only unverifiable
(who does daily headcounts ? ) , but strikes me
as a very odd approach by a health authority that
uses the word Walkerton like a whip. In an era where
quantity and quality of a water supply, and when
safe supply is a huge issue as wells concentrate
from drawdown, I again say, it seems a strange time
to be reducing standards and settling for less for
our small communities and their potable water systems.
Partial Solution: Use the Washington State method.
Go by the number of actual connections, which is
fully verifiable using the existing annual system
permitting process.
I am raising this now, in conjunction with operators,
CEUs, and programming, so that everyone here understands
the intertwining of all water purveyance issues,
and how they tie in with our juggling act for programming.
For single well owners on our islands we have a
wonderful resource available to help with your well
issues.
Good qualified operators are a win win for everyone.
So, thank you ladies and gentlemen for chasing
those leaks, struggling with cantankerous pumps
(probably the newer LMIs ), and all the other things
you do that we don’t see. I can tell you from
personal experience as a systems manager,
they also put up with a lot of unwarranted abuse
from some ungrateful property owners.
Now, for a Lions Club project. This is a perfect
example that community spirit is alive and well
in the water industry . Last fall, Integrated Water
facilitated donations of water treatment equipment
and tests for the Lions new community
dining hall project in Dinner Bay Park. UV Pure
Technologies donated 50% off a Hallett 15 UV unit,
MB Labs donated water tests, and Water Tiger donated
the big blue filtration unit. Four of our members
stepped forward to assist with the balance of the
UV cost. So we have the Hallett, MB Labs and Watertiger
reps, along with supporters Henry Till, Katherine
and Duncan Stevenson, and Marie Elliott, the Lions
project chair Cal Biem, and Lion fundraiser &
past president Len Epp and Lions treasurer Mike
Bullis.
Integrated water sincerely thanks the suppliers
and donors for your unhesitating and immediate generosity
for a Mayne Island project. Cal and Len, on behalf
of your fellow islanders and friends, we want to
thank you for all that you and the Lions Club members
do for our island.
We can't think of a Club that is more deserving
of community support. Now for a great picture.
We have a superb program lined up for you today.
There are 3 things I would like you to keep in mind
as you listen to the presentations.The first is
that Canada is second only to the States for water
consumption. Secondly, 1 in 4 Canadians rely on
groundwater And lastly, as you drawdown your wells
and aquifers, private or community, reducing your
quantity of water, you are also reducing the quality
by concentration of contents and contaminates.
On that cheery note, sit back, relax and enjoy. |
| Arsenic in Drinking Water and Treatment
Options
Dave Mellis,
President,
EDS Pumps & Plumbing Ltd. |
Arsenic is found dissolved in water
everywhere and is found in abundance in the Sechelt,
Gulf Islands, Langley areas of BC.
It cannot be destroyed, seen, smelled or tasted.
Arsenic is a carcinogen and comes in two forms:
arsenite and arsenate.
In surface water it forms insoluble salts.
It can settle into the sediment at the bottom of
a lake, but in wells it adheres to iron in the water
and doesn’t settle as much.
Sources include smelting operations, microchip
production, poultry feed, shingle and cedar preservative
and some pesticides.
Arsenic causes nerve damage, circulatory problems
and some cancers.
In Bangladesh, India and Taiwan refining processes
have caused an epidemic of disease.
10 ppm can cause cancer at a rate of 1 in 500 people.
In 2004, Canada adopted guidelines similar to WHO
and the U.S. of 10 ppm acceptability.
There are four common treatments to remove
or reduce arsenic in water.
1.Membrane filtration (or reverse osmosis):
Water is pumped through a membrane, but at the
end the membrane needs flushing. Initial water
quality must be good. Membrane filtration is 30%
effective in removing arsenite, 90% effective
for arsenate.Performance is affected by pH, the
oxidation state of the arsenic, the water temperature
and suspended solids.
2.Ion Exchange:
This is like a water softening process, and water
is required in the process.
It creates a stream of arsenic which must be dealt
with at the end. Performance is affected by the
valence state and the presence of competing ions
3.Precipitation/Co-precipitation:
This process is good for community systems.Iron
(most frequently used mineral for this process)
is added to absorb and bond to the arsenic, a
flocculent is added, it coagulates and the iron
is clarified and removed. It creates a concentration
of arsenic in a sludge which is taken to a rendering
plant for disposal.
Effectiveness depends on the source water and
the presence of other compounds.
4.Adsorption Process (AdEdge):
This is the simplest treatment and has the least
waste end product. It is suitable for private
systems as well as communities and cities. Water
is passed through and the arsenic is absorbed
by a column of granular media, commonly ferric
oxide (rust). It binds so well that it does not
leach – the media can be disposed of in
a landfill. Little maintenance is required other
than periodic destratification of the media. Performance
is affected by fouling, the state of the arsenic,
pH, flow rate and competing compounds. It is the
most cost-effective method of removing arsenic.
|
| Thinking Beyond Pumps and Pipes Oliver
Brandes, Senior Research Associate, University of
Victoria
Polis Project |
Our largest source of new water in
the coming decades will be that created by conservation.
The Polis project endeavors to embed environmental
thinking in all levels of decision-making and puts
the community in control of their water future by
providing vision and flexibility to achieve a sustainable
water future. Water sustainability depends on the
enabling of options, tools, research and new infrastructure.
Challenges include supply limitation, capital costs,
development, and groundwater withdrawal. In the
Gulf Islands those challenges also include tourism,
proximity of wells, climatic changes and fractured
governance.
Supply side management is an effective response
but we are moving away from it. Demand side management
must realize that it is a finite resource and usage
reductions must be made.
The Soft Path to Water:
- Considers the environmental impacts and thinks
into the future through a principled planning
approach
- Is a paradigm between the development of supply
infrastructure and the management of the users,
each drawing from different sources, infrastructure
and programs.
- Needs leadership to defer infrastructure costs
by reducing use. This also saves energy.
- Was seen recently when Durham, Ontario chose
a $17m efficiency plan over a $125m water infrastructure
development plan.
- Maintains that just because population increases,
water usage does not have to increase
- Relies on education, physical components, water
sensitive urban design, rain and grey water use
options
- Promotes urban changes to lawns, native greenery
and matching water quality to the appropriate
end use
- Needs green infrastructure like properly functioning
streams
- Includes “backcasting” – planning
backwards from the desired future state at the
community through to provincial levels
- Starts with the the “magic 6”: showers,
toilets, laundry, faucets, dishwashers and lawns
- Works with nature instead of against it
- Requires a change in our relationship with water
Possible Solutions for Water Management:
- Supply side: the resource is limitless (reactive)
- Demand side: the resource is finite (short term
and temporary)
- Soft path: a finite resource (proactive and
long term) – deliver the service in a sustainable
way; an intelligent use of water.
There will be resistance to this way of conservation.
Summary of Soft Path Research in Canada:
- Urban water use can drop by 45% despite 50%
growth in population
- Dietary changes can cut water use by 1/3 to
½.
Conclusions:
- Start now - get the community engaged with solutions
not problems
- Choose leaders who have vision
- Social and technical integration is needed
- Two-thirds saving are possible!
See www.waterdsm.org
for more information |
| Water Sustainability: Is the World Running
out of Water? Is Canada? Alfonso Rivera, Chief
Hydrologist
Natural Resources Canada |
40,000 km3 of water moves from the
land to the ocean in the global water cycle.
The world has 35,000,000 km3 of water and groundwater
is 30.28% of that.
Globally the world uses 60% for agriculture, 12%
for domestic and 25% for industrial purposes.
Canada uses mostly surface water and most of it
is used for industry.
There is no scarcity of water in the world. The
world used less water this year than in 2000.
Water availability and use, towards sustainability,
needs more than science.
It needs a plan: quality/quantity, infrastructure,
economic factors, water demands, laws and regulations.
It needs research on aquifer and groundwater inventory,
storage, and rates of natural recharge.
Water management in other countries varies:
Libya has a vast man-made aquifer system; it sells
water to Egypt and fruits and vegetables to Europe.
India uses dams and rainwater collection systems.
(India uses 250,000 km3/year, Canada uses 1 km3
per year.)
China has built the Three Gorges Dam – the
largest in the world. There has been huge environmental
damage.
Spain builds channel from some rivers, uses cisterns
and buys water from France.
Saudi Arabia buys water from Turkey and also has
desalinization plants.
Morocco has nuclear-powered desalinization plants
drawing from the Atlantic Ocean.
Isreal manages and conserves their groundwater.
Quebec does not have a shortage of water, and sells
it. There are political issues with this.
Australia is increasing its desalinization plants
and being criticized for that.
The Middle East uses dams.
The “trilogue” concept consists of an
interface between government, society and science.
The world’s water problem is not quantity,
but quality, conflicts in use, bulk transfer issues,
and geographical redistribution.
It is subject to economics, geography, politics
and consumption increase.
Canada’s issues are water management and knowledge,
not scarcity. |
| Q & A on Your Wells Red Williams,
Island Well Drilling |
Q How does the cost of drilling a new
well compare to the cost of deepening an existing
well?
A Deepening is usually less expensive but all costs
depend on well depth and location. Q How do you
know of a well has been sealed?
A If the bacterial count is high, then groundwater
is getting into the well.
Q Could rust bacteria cause choliform contamination
in a sealed well?
A Rust bacteria will not come from the well casing,
only from iron in the water.
Many old wells have a bio-mass in the bottom that
needs to be cleaned out.
Q How could my ten-year old well have high leaf
litter content?
A It is near a tertiary fault.
Q What are your thoughts on hydrofracturing?
A Hydrofracturing is controversial but must be used
with control, avoiding elevated ground and saltwater
proximity.
Blast fracturing which is of shorter duration, can
have fewer ill effects that hydrofracturing.
Q How do you seal abandoned wells permanently?
A By use of alternating gravel and bentonite layers
a well can be sealed for between $500 and $1000.
Q What is the lifespan of a deep well pump?
A Pumps usually last about 25 to 30 years. It is
important to replace them before they burn out.
Some older pumps contain PCB’s, like the TRW
and Barnes pumps. They should be removed.
Q How do you know where to drill for water?
A Many factors are taken into account like the allowable
area, proximity of septic fields for example.
Many people prefer to try witching first.
Q Should I fill in my dry well?
A Yes – or you could use it as a geothermal
heat pump.
Q How deep can you drill?
A We can drill up to about 1400 feet, but we never
get to bedrock in the S. Gulf Islands.
Q We are monitoring tidal influence in our well.
Is that bad?
A It could mean saltwater influence but it could
also be a natural tidal water pressure phenomenon.
Tidal influence will be felt close to the ocean,
and transmitted easier through sand and gravel soil
than in hard rock.
Also keep good well records including driller’s
records.
Q Do you utilize cameras in wells?
A This can be done even with the pump in place.
Q What is the most economical equipment with which
to monitor water level?
A Transducers with readouts are the best.
|
| Water Resource Management in San Juan
County Vicki Heater,
San Juan County Health and Community Services |
Saltwater intrusion is a problem
in San Juan County, Washington.
Long term monitoring, water level recording, and
aquifer analysis for new development is being done.
160 ppm of saltwater intrusion is the ‘trigger’
for protection measures:
Wells cannot be installed less than 1000 feet from
the shore or 1000 feet from wells with 160 ppm.
They must be eight feet above sea level and more
than 100 feet away from the septic system.
Building permits in these areas will be considered
if mitigation can be proven.
Rainwater is owned by Washington State and you need
a permit to collect it.
Rainwater catchment as a sole source is a viable
alternative in the County, and where wells cannot
be drilled.
She suggests that we map actual saltwater intrusion
on the island and use that information in the Building
Code.
Vicki can be contacted at vickih@co.san-juan.wa.us. |
| Prize Draw |
Premier Plastics (flashlights): Angela
Kingerlee, John Sanders
Water Matters (shower filter): Sheila Thompson
Osborne Electro Mechanics (utility pump): Katherine
Stevenson
Remax Realty (wood carved box): Hazel Hansen
Water Tiger (reverse osmosis unit): Deborah
EDS Pumps (reverse osmosis system): Bruce Ingimundsen
Corix (Makita drill set): Al Wood
Islands Trust (coffee table book): Warwick Trigg
|
| Update on MIIWSS Activities and Plans
for 2008 Mary Cooper,
Chair and Program Director |
Excerpts from Mary Cooper’s afternoon
presentation: Highlights for Integrated Water,
and lobbying status:
The date of our 2009 workshop is Saturday, April
25. We have booked the Dockside Green presentation
from Victoria.
Development on the islands seems to be the issue
of the day, so this would be right on topic.
Our '2008 AGM is Saturday, May 24, 1pm. at the
Lighthouse. With development issues, tourism growth,
and specific
project goals, we are going to circle the wagons
and focus on Mayne at this meeting.
We have offered to place water conservation signs
on our sister SG Islands.
South Pender, being solely reliant on groundwater,
was the first to accept.
We will proceed from there to the other islands
as finances, equipment and interest allow.
We will be at the fall fair again August 16 with
consultants and loads of information.
Bob Burgess of Rainwater Connections will have a
demo system set up.
Our expanding website seems to have been a positive
addition.
We have added 4 new member water systems data -
1 from Saturna, 2 from Salt Spring and 1 from Pender.
Judi Walker has taken the library water resource
shelf project under her experienced wing and we
are looking for recommendations
on good how- to books. An interesting addition might
be water conservation books geared toward children.
We have stored 155 VIHA Water Advisory signs at
the firehall for the use of community water systems
and inspected premises.
Thanks to Fire Chief Jeff, they will be available
24/7.
In a cooperative effort with our Fire Department,
we are holding a 1-day confined spaces workshop,
Saturday, October 25. While this is geared for small
water systems operators and firemen, the owners
of large water storage tanks are also
encouraged to attend. As is our practice, we will
keep the cost to a minimum.
In the fall we will be assisting Queen's University
Masters candidate Shawn Trimper, working on his
graduate thesis on
the potential risk of viral pathogens in groundwater.
He needs locations with fractured rock, low overburden,
wells and septics……..and here we are!
This is a Canada wide study covering Newfoundland,
Ontario and BC
and we will need the participation of 5 to 10 well
owners.
If you are interested, we need to hear from you.
We will be protecting your well interests by having
a qualified person with Shawn.
University of Waterloo is conducting a 2-year study
on the practices, and knowledge of residential builders
re water
efficiency, promoting innovative practices in use
in BC, Ontario, Alberta and California. We have
agreed to be available.
With the plethora of small water systems on the
islands, we are in an ideal position to work with
an Island version
of the UVIC Polis Project Soft Path for Water with
Oliver Brandes and his team.
As you know there are 3 areas where we have focused
our lobbying efforts over the past 3 years:
rainwater collection within the building code bylaws,
water well hydrofracturing meeting reporting and
good practices standards within Phase 3 of groundwater
legislation, and a low flush toilet rebate using
federal gas tax funds.
On rainwater collection:
From what we have been able to glean, Bill 10 appears
to be an enabling bill that permits local government
to pass
greener bylaws for energy and water conservation
in general terms.
Our wish was that the Provincial Government would
take a province wide stance on placing mandatory
rainwater
collection systems within the code using provincial
legislation, but this bill seems to leave us to
work with local governments.
This is naturally going to produce piecemeal results.
My thoughts are that it’s a tad cowardly,
but it is politics after all.
Potable water quantity has moved beyond being a
local issue, as has the desire to protect our water
quality directly affected by over taxing aquifers.
And, as is usually the case, the public is far ahead
of legislation.
Devolving responsibility is much more economical
for the provincial government therefore our local
governments
will once again bear the burden of programming and
enforcement costs, as well as being subject to local
pressures.
I sense this devolution is an attempt not to upset
developers by increasing building costs with mandatory
rainwater collection installations.
For those under the umbrella of the CRD, we know
full well that if you get a $100 rebate, you have
paid them $100 up front.
So don’t have expectations of rebates for
rainwater collection. We unincorporated ruralists
will continue to have
great difficulty accessing funding while the cities
get the bulk of attention----using rural tax dollars.
From my perspective at this point, Bill 10 is all
hat and no cattle. If it’s the right thing
to do locally, it’s the right thing to do
provincially.
Hydrofracturing:
We will continue to make sure that our stance on
hydrofracturing inclusion within legislation sits
on every appropriate desk.
We are consistent in our belief that:
1. hydrofracturing should not be allowed under
any circumstances within a minimum of 100 meters
of the ocean, especially with eroding shorelines
and rising sea water.
2. that those employing the hydrofracturing
process be required to test community and private
wells within a set circumference before the process
begins. This is simply due diligence.
3. that all hydrofracturing must be pre-approved
by the Ministry of Environment, recorded on the
driller’s report and
maintained as part of the permanent well record.
4. where there is a proximity to community water
systems, water boards must be given advance notice
and an opportunity to comment.
In the above we have the full written support of
the Islands Trust in a letter sent to the Ministry
of Environment June 28, 2007, as well as the Gulf
Island Alliance.
Every one of these proposals is based on the cautionary
principle. After the fact knowledge of inflicted
damage is not much help
to the suffering well owner next door, and successful
lawsuits depend on meticulous long term well records
and proven damage.
Only lawyers win in law suits.
In the letter to the Alliance, the Assistant Deputy
Minister, Water Stewardship Division, states that
hydrofracturing will - in
all probability – in some fashion, be dealt
with through a Water Management Plan, similar to
the one being developed by Langley,
an inland, non-saltwater-surrounded city. One of
the items might include drilling authorizations
for specific areas.
In other words, it will in all probability be another
devolved responsibility, where we are dealing with
local governments
and achieving spotty results - again. Minimally,
we would hope that legislation would cover the Gulf
Islands.
Hyrdofracturing dangers facing the islands will
be the same for an interior well owner, minus salt
water intrusion.
Drilling in the vicinity of a garbage dump? Fertilized
acreages?
Contaminated soil site near gas stations? Leaching
near junk yards? An old mine site?
Or near contaminated surface water such as a stream
or river ?
Best protection practices should not be exclusive
to coastal community aquifers. Drinking water is
equally unpotable whether
it is degraded by salt water intrusion or other
contaminates. Application of the cautionary principle
should be the first concern
for all governments when it comes to drinking water
protection----- and nothing is banned within our
proposal except the no- brainer
for shoreline proximity. Hydrofracturing by proven
necessity is still an option.
How Ministry devolvement works for rural areas with
no incorporated areas of local government will be
problematic.
Prior to Phase 3 being enacted, there will be a
time for public input.
I am hoping for better publicized comment components
than occurred for Phase 2.
We will keep you posted.
Our position: The application of regulations for
hydrofracturing should be province-wide.
All of us are under development and tourism pressure.
We must continue to monitor development planning
as it relates to our community water and aquifers.
Keep your head up on how your community aquifers
are going to be accessed within each development.
Work with the Island Trustees wherever possible
for the best results for your island.
There are still battles to be fought to drive home
community concerns about aquifer endangerment.
Low Flush Toilet Project:
Regretfully, we are writing off the low flush toilet
gas tax funds rebate project. Both CRD Director
Susan DeGryp and I went
into this with high hopes for common sense from
governments that cared about water sustainability
on our islands.
We did minimally expect the support of our provincial
signing authority, Minister of Community Services
Ida Chong - and were disappointed –
all around. In this case, actions did speak louder
than her words that praised the value of the project.
We truly believed that words, so nobly written into
the Agreements meant something to the authors and
the signatories.
We were obviously wrong.
Words such as: “ secure water supply in the
face of drought”, “water conservation/demand
management plans”,
“support the achievement of the environmental
sustainability outcomes of cleaner water”,
“a flexible approach”,
“keeping plans off the shelf and putting them
into action”, and finally, the real capper:
“Canada, British Columbia and UBCM, commit
to ensuring equity between urban and rural/remote
communities”.
Now you can understand our disillusionment when
we discovered all this motherhood is not worth the
paper it is written on
for rural communities who care about water conservation,
the future of our aquifers, not to mention the value
of island properties.
We are still right. They are wrong!
We have hundreds of hours and a good deal of money
into this project. Our executive agreed we should
try for a grant
from the Provincial Government. After contacting
our MP Gary Lunn and MLA Murray Coell for alternate
funding information,
I have learned there is no current funding available.
Minister Coell will keep us on his list.
From federal Minister Cannon we have the infamous
rejection letter boasting how communities such as
Mayne Island
will continue to benefit from the growing Gas Tax
Fund, but not one word has changed to allow rural
tax dollars to be spent within
rural communities for rural water conservation measures.
Since the gas tax agreements state that there should
be no inequality of application between rural and
urban,
it is a personal goal of mine to bring the inequalities
of the application of these agreements to the attention
of our governments
at every opportunity.
Money should be used at the ground level to produce
ground level results---saving water and protecting
aquifers.
The money, in fact, is our tax dollars, rural and
urban alike, belonging to all of us, and we all
should benefit equally.
One out of four Canadians rely on wells. Water
is vital to your health, your life and your property
values.
If you have a low flush toilet and your neighbour
doesn’t, his straw is in your pond. You lose.
It’s that simple.
It is up to us to act on issues raised here today,
and to carry the message to our friends, neighbours
and our guests.
Groundwater is an unseen and an unknown.
What your neighbour does IS your business when
it comes to watering gardens in August, washing
cars mid drought, and
generally displaying blissful aquifer ignorance.
Its not always going to be easy, but we are making
inroads.
Every well is a straw in the pond of community aquifers.
Thank you. |
| Xeriscaping Dr. Quentin Cronk, Director,
UBC Botanical Gardens |
Much research is being done on plant
drought tolerance because of the impact that drought
has on world agriculture. Plants have survival mechanisms.
Complete dessication can be survived by a few plants,
others survive by drought hardening, glycolization
(covering with sugar), and physical barriers (cacti),
reflective surfaces, narrow leaves, and drought
avoidance (bulbs).
The southern Gulf Islands have Mediterranean shrubland
type of vegetation. Winters are expected to get
wetter, with more storms and a 10% summer temperature
drop by 2050.
Xeriscaping is water conservation in landscaping,
including practices such as:
- design for conservation (use of gray and roof
water)
- alternatives to lawns (gravel gardens, pavers)
- use of drought-tolerant plants (there are 75,000
species of plants in other Mediterranean areas
of the world)
- water retentive soil amendments
- mulches to slow soil humus oxidation by the
sun
- targeted watering.
We need a water-wise gardening section and instructions
in our nurseries. Drought resistant plants include:
- Manzanita, Laurel Sumac, Coffeeberry from California
- French Lavender, Wallflower from southern Europe
- Melaluca, Gum Tree and Canberra Gem from Australia
- Cape Fuchsia from South Africa.
Refer to Heidi Gluldemeister’s, “Gardening
the Mediterranean Way”. |
| Pharmaceuticals in Groundwater –
An Emerging Concern? |
Our bodies only use 25% of medications,
the remainder goes into our ecology. All land activities
affect surface and groundwater by the addition of
pathogens, nutrients, metals, pharmaceuticals.
We have no idea how this is affecting our health.
Data is now being calibrated. |
| Dr. Asit Mazumder, University of Victoria |
Drugs for heart disease, pain and
birth control are very potent.
The deeper the water source the safer it is; surface
water–connected wells are less safe.
Research in Ontario found drugs in many of the water
sources.
We need to research persistence, strength, transformations
and our body’s ability to handle them.
Pharmacies are now taking unused drugs back for
proper disposal.
Caffeine is used as an indicator because it is so
commonly used in pharmaceuticals and it is easy
to detect, i.e.,
caffeine frequently indicates fecal contamination.
Ibuprofen is found in Salt Spring Island lakes.
The nitrogen isotope can be used to detect septic
input to source water.
Water treatment is not effective in the removal
of pharmaceuticals from water, so we must take responsibility
to reduce
the loading of chemicals and microbes in our water.
By laws to stop fertilization and better land planning
will help as will pressure
on the pharmaceutical industry to develop less toxic
drugs and include environmental tests in their development. |
| Rainwater Catchment Tim Pope, President,
American Rainwater Catchment Association |
There are 190 rainwater catchment
systems in San Juan county at this time.
Amendments to the Plumbing Code are underway.
There is progress in the training and accreditation
of installers and designers of rainwater catchment
systems.
Tim will advise MIIWSS when the next course is in
this area.
Copper piping can be affected by acid rain in the
system.
Average system is 10,000 gallons for a dry summer
for two people.
Mayne Islanders are encourages to join the association
- see ARCA.org.
MIIWSS can also be an affiliate chapter. |
| Climate Change – Implications
for Groundwater Recharge and Saltwater Intrusion on
the Gulf Islands Dr. Diana Allen, Associate Professor,
Department of Earth Sciences, SFU |
Groundwater interaction with surface
water is important especially for shallow groundwater
sources.
Factors influencing recharge include the amount,
the season, the intensity of rain, and ground’s
ability to absorb rain.
Causes of variations in water levels include El
Nino, and Pacific Decadal Oscillation cycles.
Decrease in recharge affects the saltwater interface,
as can increased pumping.
Observation of fractures in bedrock and fault zones,
permeability estimates in sandstone and mud can
help predict saltwater intrusion.
Climate models predict that by 2050 the global
precipitation will change with precipitation increasing
by 2%.
Sea levels can rise anywhere from a few cm to a
meter, but the Juan De Fuca subduction plate is
pushing this area of land upwards.
A bigger risk to the intrusion interface is water
extraction.
Link
to full presentation can be found here. |
Day’s End
Prize Draw |
Caroma Toilet won by Gordon Martin
from Mill Bay. |
| |
|
Mayne Island Integrated Water Systems Society
THANKS OUR
Mayne Island COMMUNITY SUPPORTERS
Mayne Island Lions Club
Gulfport Realty
Remax Real Estate
Wild Fennel Restaurant
Tru Value Grocery Store
Bob Connelly: sound system
Billeters: Hazel and Marvin Hansen, Sally and Fred Sexsmith
Lori Brown and Ingrid Marsh for the Health Centre xeriscaped
garden tour
The Local Trust Committees of:
Mayne Island
North Pender Island
South Pender Island
Saturna Island
Galiano Island
Salt Spring Island
Southern Gulf Islands CRD Director Susan DeGryp
BC Ministry of Environment
And the Water Industry Exhibitors for Adding to the Draw
Prize List
MIIWSS Wishes To Thank Everyone
For Making The Annual Water Workshop
Possible and Accessible
To All Islanders Who Care About Our Islands’ Finite
Water Supply
|
|